Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

WinterCraft WP52

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

13

10

49

24

Best position

#7

#2

#1

Average position

11.9

12.2

3.2

2.7

Latest test

2025

2024

2025

Available sizes

78

207

213

302

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

76%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Wet Braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

97%

Wet Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

94%

Wet Circle Cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

93%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Aquaplaning Cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Dry Performance

86%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

82%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Dry Braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Dry Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Snow Performance

63%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

77%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

82%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Snow Braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Snow Traction

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Snow Circle Cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Comfort & Noise

78%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Noise Exterior

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

87%

Economy

69%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

69%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Rolling Resistance

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2023	225/40 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

WinterCraft WP52

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison