Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

VS

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

13

24

3

14

Best position

#7

#1

#4

#1

Average position

11.9

2.7

4.3

3.6

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

78

302

97

188

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance

73%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

88%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Wet Braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

69%

Wet Circle Cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

77%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

76%

Aquaplaning Cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dry Performance

82%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

74%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Dry Braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Dry Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Snow Performance

60%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

81%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Snow Braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow Traction

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

58%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Snow Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

53%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

88%

Snow Circle Cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

88%

Comfort & Noise

73%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

80%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Noise Exterior

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Ride Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Economy

61%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

85%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Rolling Resistance

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

53%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

77%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

96%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2025	215/55 R17	View
Autobild	Winter	2025	225/40 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison