18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test Profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
13
14
10
23
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
3.6
12.2
6.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
78
188
207
107

Snow

Snow
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
52%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow traction
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Snow braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Snow handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
27%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Snow performance
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Lateral guidance on snow
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%

Wet

Wet
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Wet braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Wet handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
58%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Wet circle cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Wet performance
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%

Dry

Dry
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dry handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dry braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dry lane changing
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Dry steering response
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Dry performance
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%

Costs

Costs
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Rolling resistance
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Mileage
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Price/value
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Exterior noise
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Offroad

Offroad
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison