Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

VS

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

13

14

3

24

Best position

#7

#1

#4

#1

Average position

11.9

3.6

4.3

2.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

78

188

97

302

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance

73%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

78%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

88%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Wet Braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Wet Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

93%

Wet Circle Cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

93%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Aquaplaning Cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

92%

Dry Performance

82%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

78%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

74%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Dry Braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Dry Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Snow Performance

60%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

80%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Snow Braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Snow Traction

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

58%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Snow Handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

53%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Snow Circle Cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Comfort & Noise

73%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

72%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

70%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Noise Exterior

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Ride Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Economy

61%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

69%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

85%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Rolling Resistance

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

53%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

96%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2025	215/55 R17	View
Autobild	Winter	2025	225/40 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison