18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

4 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
23
17
49
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
11.0
1.7
3.2
Latest test
2022
2025
2024
Available sizes
359
80
213

Performance comparison

Averaged from 4 tests

Wet Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
80%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Wet Braking
Falken EuroWinter HS01
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Wet Handling
Falken EuroWinter HS01
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Wet Circle Cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS01
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Falken EuroWinter HS01
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Aquaplaning Cross
Falken EuroWinter HS01
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Dry Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
69%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Dry Braking
Falken EuroWinter HS01
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dry Handling
Falken EuroWinter HS01
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Dry Lane Change
Falken EuroWinter HS01
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Dry Steering Reaction
Falken EuroWinter HS01
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Snow Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
66%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Snow Braking
Falken EuroWinter HS01
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Snow Traction
Falken EuroWinter HS01
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Snow Handling
Falken EuroWinter HS01
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Snow Circle Cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS01
42%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Ice Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
87%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Ice Braking Abs
Falken EuroWinter HS01
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Comfort & Noise
Falken EuroWinter HS01
88%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Noise Exterior
Falken EuroWinter HS01
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Noise Interior
Falken EuroWinter HS01
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Ride Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS01
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Economy
Falken EuroWinter HS01
63%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
66%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Rolling Resistance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Mileage
Falken EuroWinter HS01
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
55%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2022215/60 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2021195/55 R16View
AutoexpressAutoexpress
Winter
2020205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison