18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

4 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
23
49
17
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
11.0
3.2
1.7
Latest test
2022
2024
2025
Available sizes
359
213
80

Performance comparison

Averaged from 4 tests

Wet Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
80%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Wet Braking
Falken EuroWinter HS01
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Wet Handling
Falken EuroWinter HS01
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet Circle Cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS01
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Falken EuroWinter HS01
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning Cross
Falken EuroWinter HS01
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
69%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Dry Braking
Falken EuroWinter HS01
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
77%
Dry Handling
Falken EuroWinter HS01
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dry Lane Change
Falken EuroWinter HS01
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry Steering Reaction
Falken EuroWinter HS01
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
66%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Snow Braking
Falken EuroWinter HS01
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow Traction
Falken EuroWinter HS01
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Snow Handling
Falken EuroWinter HS01
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Snow Circle Cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS01
42%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Ice Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
87%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Ice Braking Abs
Falken EuroWinter HS01
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Comfort & Noise
Falken EuroWinter HS01
88%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Noise Exterior
Falken EuroWinter HS01
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Noise Interior
Falken EuroWinter HS01
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
Ride Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS01
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
73%
Economy
Falken EuroWinter HS01
63%
Falken
EuroWinter HS01
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
66%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Rolling Resistance
Falken EuroWinter HS01
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Mileage
Falken EuroWinter HS01
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
96%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2022215/60 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2021195/55 R16View
AutoexpressAutoexpress
Winter
2020205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison