18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken EuroALL Season AS210 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Nexen N Blue 4 Season vs. Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2

Let's examine two all-season tyres: the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 and the Continental AllSeasonContact and see how they compare against each other based on data collected from several tyre tests.


The Falken EuroALL Season AS210 managed to secure seventh-place in the Autobild test out of 27 tyres. Its performance on wet circle cornering, wet handling, dry handling, and comfort was excellent - demonstrating its usability for a variety of conditions. However, it fell short when it came to snow handling, with slight understeering and elevated rolling resistance. Despite these shortcomings, users praised its low interior noise levels and notable durability.


On the other hand, the Continental AllSeasonContact needed no introduction – taking fifth place in the Autobild test. Despite its perceived internal noise issue, the Conti outperformed the Falken in many aspects, particularly on snow. Its braking, cornering, and handling on snow were rated superior, a feat further amplified by its laudable wet circle cornering and aquaplaning resistance. Notwithstanding these impressive attributes, its traction on snowy territory was slightly criticised, which was a similar concern for the Falken tyre.


Indeed, the Continental AllSeasonContact triumphed over the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 on multiple tyre test fronts. In a direct comparison by TyreReviews.com, the Continental offered superior handling in both wet and dry conditions. Conversely, the Falken tyre fell short on tests, showing extended dry braking distance.


In conclusion, the Continental AllSeasonContact seems to be the better-performing tyre overall. However, the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 still delivers appreciable handling and comfort at a lower price, making it a viable choice for cost-conscious drivers.


It's worth contemplating on your specific driving conditions, personal preferences, and budget when deciding between these two tyres from Continental and Falken.

Test Profile

Falken
EuroALL Season AS210
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Nexen
N Blue 4 Season
Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
G-Grip All Season 2
Number of tests
16
26
15
5
6
Best position
#5
#1
#1
#11
#3
Average position
7.3
4.2
8.5
17.0
13.0
Latest test
2024
2024
2022
2021
2021
Available sizes
125
100
73
32
69

Wet

Wet
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
76%
Continental AllSeasonContact
80%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
71%
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
60%
Wet handling
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
73%
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
66%
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
55%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
82%
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
74%
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
60%
Wet braking
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
74%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
72%
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
65%
Wet circle cornering
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
71%
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
65%
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
51%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
76%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
65%
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
67%

Snow

Snow
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
73%
Continental AllSeasonContact
88%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
79%
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
95%
Snow handling
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
72%
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
77%
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
96%
Snow traction
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
72%
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
67%
Viking Fourtech
51%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
87%
Snow braking
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
79%
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
76%
Viking Fourtech
82%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
96%
Snow cornering
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
67%
Continental AllSeasonContact
93%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
79%
Viking Fourtech
67%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
96%

Costs

Costs
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
70%
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
69%
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
74%
Rolling resistance
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
58%
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
56%
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
79%
Price/value
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
88%
Continental AllSeasonContact
63%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
95%
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
63%
Mileage
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
85%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
77%
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
74%
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
84%
Exterior noise
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
75%
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
86%
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
84%
Comfort
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
73%
Continental AllSeasonContact
76%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
77%
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
87%

Dry

Dry
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
73%
Continental AllSeasonContact
76%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
74%
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
64%
Dry braking
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
69%
Continental AllSeasonContact
68%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
74%
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
66%
Dry handling
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
77%
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
71%
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
61%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
All season
2021225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2020205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2018195/65 R15View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison