18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Pirelli
Cinturato (C3)
Number of tests
3
3
4
Best position
#2
#4
#1
Average position
3.7
4.3
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
34
97

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
89%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison