Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

WinterCraft WP52+

Cinturato (C3)

9.4

R16 – R20

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52+

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

3

4

Best position

#2

#4

#1

Average position

3.7

4.3

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

34

97

—

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52+

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison