Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52+

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

3

Best position

#2

#4

#2

Average position

3.7

4.3

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

34

97

60

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52+

Ventus Evo

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison