Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

3

23

5

14

Best position

#2

#4

#1

Average position

3.7

4.3

3.3

2.2

3.6

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

34

97

176

63

188

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Wet circle cornering

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Dry lane changing

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Dry steering response

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Mileage

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Price/value

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison