18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
3
3
2
Best position
#2
#4
#1
Average position
3.7
4.3
1.5
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
34
97
65

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Wet circle cornering
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
64%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Dunlop Winter
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison