Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

Number of tests

3

1

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

3.7

4.0

1.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

34

54

64

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook ION Evo

e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison