18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
3
15
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
3.7
9.0
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
34
225
60

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Price/value
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Mileage
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison