18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Falken

e.Ziex

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Hankook

ION Evo

Number of tests

3

15

1

Best position

#2

#2

#1

Average position

3.7

9.0

1.0

Latest test

2025

2025

2025

Available sizes

34

225

64

Wet

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Price/value

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Mileage

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Comfort

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison