18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
3
13
1
Best position
#2
#4
#1
Average position
3.7
6.3
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
34
111
64

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Price/value
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Mileage
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
69%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison