18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Vredestein Quatrac

Vredestein

Quatrac

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Falken

e.Ziex

Hankook

ION Evo

Vredestein

Quatrac

Number of tests

3

1

16

Best position

#2

#1

#1

Average position

3.7

1.0

3.1

Latest test

2025

2025

2025

Available sizes

34

64

86

Wet

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Wet circle cornering

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Dry

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Costs

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Mileage

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Vredestein Quatrac

56%

Price/value

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Vredestein Quatrac

64%

Comfort

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison