18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
3
3
18
3
2
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.7
3.3
6.1
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
34
40
47
60
23

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Wet side guide
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Wet circle cornering
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry lane changing
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison