18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
3
18
3
2
1
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.7
6.1
3.3
1.0
1.0
Latest test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
34
47
40
23
64

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Wet circle cornering
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison