18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
3
6
15
Best position
#2
#3
#1
Average position
3.7
4.7
1.2
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
34
146
122

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Wet circle cornering
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental SportContact 7
86%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Dry lane changing
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Dry steering response
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
85%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental SportContact 7
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison