18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
3
23
1
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.7
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
34
188
64

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet side guide
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
94%
Wet circle cornering
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry steering response
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
97%
Dry lane changing
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Price/value
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison