Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

e.Ziex

Potenza Sport

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

3

23

3

26

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.7

3.3

2.2

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

34

187

40

66

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet side guide

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental PremiumContact 7

100%

Wet circle cornering

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry lane changing

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry steering response

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Price/value

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

63%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Mileage

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

e.Ziex

Potenza Sport

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison