Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

3

14

5

1

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

3.7

3.6

2.2

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

34

188

63

64

40

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Wet circle cornering

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry lane changing

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry steering response

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Mileage

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Price/value

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison