Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK520 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6
Table of contents:
| # | Falken Azenis FK520
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In a comparison between Falken Azenis FK520 and Bridgestone Turanza 6, both summer tyres have their strengths and weaknesses. Manufactured in Turkey, the Falken Azenis FK520 has replaced the previous model, Falken Azenis FK510, and holds a rating of 75%. This tyre excels in comfort, handling on gravel, exterior noise, wet braking, and wet circle cornering, as tested in Autobild. It also performs well in aquaplaning-longitudal according to Automotorsport. However, limitations have been observed in its side grip during wet conditions.
On the other hand, the Bridgestone Turanza 6, manufactured in Spain, replaces the Bridgestone Turanza T005 and rates higher at 83%. Its best features include comfort and rolling resistance as per Autobild test, as well as in rolling resistance as per Automotorsport. While its performance in preventing aquaplaning and braking on wet surfaces, and sportive dynamic yet easily manageable driving on dry roads are commendable, it falls short in terms of traction and corner grip during wet conditions and tends to be bumpy at transverse joints. The tyre's economy level is also just average.
Overall, in a direct comparison of test rankings, the Falken Azenis FK520 takes the 8th and 7th places in the Autobild and Automotorsport tests respectively, among 50 and 8 total tyres tested in each. Meanwhile, Bridgestone Turanza 6 ranks 16th in the Autobild test, but manages to climb up to the 4th place in Automotorsport.
Therefore, Falken Azenis FK520 could be a better choice for those prioritising comfort, low exterior noise and wet performance, despite some drawbacks in its wet side grip. Conversely, Bridgestone Turanza 6 might appeal more to those looking for a tyre with less rolling resistance and excellent dry road performance, although its wet performance and ride comfort on certain road conditions might be less satisfactory.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 | 60.7 | 27 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 63.8 | 27.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
