Comparison: Dunlop Winter vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Dunlop

Winter

VS

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Winter

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Number of tests

2

3

Best position

#1

#4

#2

Average position

1.5

4.3

3.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

65

97

34

Wet

Dunlop Winter

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Dunlop Winter

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Dunlop Winter

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Dunlop Winter

63%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Dunlop Winter

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Dunlop Winter

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Snow

Dunlop Winter

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dry

Dunlop Winter

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Dunlop Winter

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Dunlop Winter

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Dunlop Winter

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Dunlop Winter

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Dunlop Winter

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Dunlop Winter

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Dunlop Winter vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Winter

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison