Comparison: Dunlop Winter vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Dunlop

Winter

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Winter

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

2

3

14

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

1.5

3.3

3.6

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

65

40

188

34

64

Wet

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Dunlop Winter

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet performance

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Wet braking

Dunlop Winter

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Dunlop Winter

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Dunlop Winter

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Snow

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow traction

Dunlop Winter

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Snow braking

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Snow cornering

Dunlop Winter

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Snow handling

Dunlop Winter

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Costs

Dunlop Winter

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Dunlop Winter

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Price/value

Dunlop Winter

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dry

Dunlop Winter

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry performance

Dunlop Winter

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Dry braking

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Dunlop Winter

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Dunlop Winter vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Winter

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison