18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs. Viking WinTech vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5
Vredestein
Wintrac Pro
Viking
WinTech
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
48
37
6
17
Best position
#1
#1
#11
#1
Average position
4.9
6.4
20.8
1.7
Latest test
2025
2024
2024
2025
Available sizes
189
128
59
80

Snow

Snow
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
88%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75%
Viking WinTech
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
83%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
81%
Viking WinTech
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Snow braking
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
83%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
81%
Viking WinTech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow handling
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
84%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
64%
Viking WinTech
47%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow cornering
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
83%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
76%
Viking WinTech
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Snow performance
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
85%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
69%
Viking WinTech
77%
Snow acceleration
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
79%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%

Dry

Dry
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
78%
Viking WinTech
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dry braking
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
66%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
80%
Viking WinTech
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dry handling
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
79%
Viking WinTech
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry driving behavior
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
82%
Viking WinTech
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Dry performance
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
81%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
83%
Viking WinTech
79%

Wet

Wet
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
81%
Viking WinTech
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
75%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
80%
Viking WinTech
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
80%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
73%
Viking WinTech
46%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
71%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
78%
Viking WinTech
52%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet handling
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
82%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
85%
Viking WinTech
52%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Wet circle cornering
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
81%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
86%
Viking WinTech
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Comfort

Comfort
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
72%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75%
Viking WinTech
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Exterior noise
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
68%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
72%
Viking WinTech
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comfort
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
72%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
73%
Viking WinTech
50%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Interior noise
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
76%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
78%
Viking WinTech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Costs

Costs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
66%
Viking WinTech
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Mileage
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
66%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
62%
Viking WinTech
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Rolling resistance
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
82%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Price/value
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
67%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Fuel efficiency
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
88%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
84%
Viking WinTech
82%

Ice

Ice
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
81%
Viking WinTech
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ice braking
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
69%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
82%
Viking WinTech
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ice lateral guidance
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
79%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
78%
Viking WinTech
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison