18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5
Barum
Polaris 3
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
48
10
14
17
Best position
#1
#3
#3
#1
Average position
4.9
10.6
16.0
1.7
Latest test
2025
2018
2020
2025
Available sizes
189
67
66
80

Snow

Snow
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
88%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
83%
Barum Polaris 3
89%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Snow braking
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
83%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow handling
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
84%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow cornering
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
83%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Snow performance
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
85%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%

Dry

Dry
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dry braking
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
66%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dry handling
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry driving behavior
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Dry performance
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
81%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%

Wet

Wet
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Barum Polaris 3
74%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
75%
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
80%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
71%
Barum Polaris 3
65%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet handling
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
82%
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Wet circle cornering
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
81%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Comfort

Comfort
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
72%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Exterior noise
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
68%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comfort
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Interior noise
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
76%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Costs

Costs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Mileage
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
66%
Barum Polaris 3
68%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Rolling resistance
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
82%
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Price/value
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
67%
Barum Polaris 3
81%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Fuel efficiency
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
88%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%

Ice

Ice
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ice braking
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
69%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ice lateral guidance
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison