Segment
1. Dunlop Quattromaxx Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kumho (58%). But when it comes to comparing Dunlop Quattromaxx and Kumho Crugen HP91, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Quattromaxx and the Crugen HP91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Dunlop Quattromaxx dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Kumho Crugen HP91 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Dunlop Quattromaxx
| Kumho Crugen HP91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Dunlop Quattromaxx Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
1. Dunlop Quattromaxx Exemplary2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Dunlop Quattromaxx Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||