Segment
1. Dunlop All Season 2 Premium
Comparison: Dunlop All Season 2 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Table of contents:
| # | Dunlop All Season 2
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Quick summary: The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 (our rating: 88%) consistently beats the Dunlop All Season 2 (our rating: 66%) across independent comparisons. Both are true all‑season tyres, but test results show the Continental is the more convincing all‑round performer, while the Dunlop’s main selling points are value and exceptional mileage.
Links: Compare the tyres here: Dunlop All Season 2 and Continental AllSeasonContact 2. Manufacturer pages: Dunlop and Continental.
Replacement status: Neither model is listed as having been replaced by a newer model in the supplied data.
Test positions & aggregated findings
- Auto Express: Continental placed 2nd (best for snow braking and wet handling); Dunlop 5th of 6 (noted for rolling resistance).
- Auto Bild (large comparative tests): Continental ranks 7th of 30 and 3rd of 37 in different runs, praised for wet/dry handling, snow traction and low exterior noise; Dunlop ranks 15th of 30 and 11th of 37, repeatedly highlighted for price/value and outstanding mileage.
- Overall test rating difference is substantial: Continental 88% vs Dunlop 66%, reflecting Continental’s stronger performance envelope in safety‑relevant areas.
Strengths — Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- Balanced performance: Strong results on wet and snowy surfaces — excellent wet handling, short braking distances and secure dry behaviour.
- Safety‑oriented handling: Multiple tests call out its wet circle cornering and reliable snow traction; Continental finishes near the top in most test grids.
- Refined NVH & efficiency: Exterior noise and rolling resistance are highlighted as strengths in comparisons.
Weaknesses — Continental
- Price: Positioned at a higher price level than budget alternatives.
- Mileage: Some tests note slightly reduced kilometer performance compared with the best long‑life competitors.
- Aquaplaning reserves: Described as average in a few reports, so on extreme deep‑water scenarios there’s less reserve compared to specialist designs.
Strengths — Dunlop All Season 2
- Value for money: Repeatedly praised for cost efficiency — top marks in the cost/cost‑per‑km chapter.
- Outstanding mileage: Best kilometre performance in several tests makes it an attractive option for high‑mileage drivers.
- Fuel efficiency / rolling resistance: Appears as an efficient tyre in fuel/mileage metrics.
Weaknesses — Dunlop
- Wet braking & aquaplaning: Tests highlight extended wet braking distances and deficits in aquaplaning performance.
- Dry & sporty handling: Not as confident on dry roads or when push‑handling compared with leading all‑season rivals.
- Sideslip on snow: Some reports mention only moderate lateral control on packed snow.
Head‑to‑head verdict
If you prioritize safety and performance across mixed conditions (wet, dry and snow) the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the clear pick — it finishes consistently higher in head‑to‑head tests and scores 88% overall. The Dunlop All Season 2 is compelling where cost, fuel economy and maximum mileage matter most, but it concedes ground on wet braking, aquaplaning and dynamic handling. For balanced all‑season capability choose Continental; for budget‑minded, high‑mileage use choose Dunlop.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | Running costs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 130 |
| Dunlop All Season 2 Rating: Recommended | 97.6 | 99.3 | 93.5 | 99.7 | 98.6 | 100.0 | 99.1 | 87.0 | 94.4 | 130 |
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 99.0 | 99.8 | 98.6 | 99.7 | 100.0 | 92.9 | 98.6 | 92.7 | 93.6 | 117 |
| Show test details | ||||||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Dunlop All Season 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2- | 3+ | 1 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Dunlop All Season 2 | 42.5 | 49.2 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 41.5 | 44.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Dunlop All Season 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 3+ | 2- | 3+ | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Dunlop All Season 2 | 41.6 | 57.3 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.0 | 53.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
