18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Sava Intensa HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Today we are looking at two summer tyres, the Debica Presto HP2 and the Sava Intensa HP2. These tyres, produced by Debica and Sava respectively, were both tested on numerous occasions.


The Debica Presto HP2 has an average rating of 79% from our tests. This tyre has proven its worth with its optimal price/value balance according to Autobild test. In terms of ranking, it secured 16th place out of 53 in the Autobild test and held a respectable 7th position in an ADAC evaluation of 18 tyres. A Sportauto 2024 summary underlined its good environmental balance as well as performance in terms of wear and efficiency. However, it did note that it was not entirely balanced, pointing out some weaknesses in driving safety.


On the other hand, we have the Sava Intensa HP2, which has an average rating of 67%. It was praised for being efficient and light by Sportauto 2024. Nevertheless, they also noted that the tyre was not entirely balanced, with weaknesses in driving safety and performance on both wet and dry surfaces. It also fell short in terms of environmental impact, with minor weaknesses in wear and tear. In a direct comparison with Debica Presto HP2, it landed 22nd place out of 53 in the Autobild tests and 12th in the ADAC test, making it slightly less favoured in tests.


It's noteworthy to mention that the Sava Intensa HP2 is the successor to the Sava Intensa HP. However, neither of the tyres have been replaced by a newer model at this time.


To summarise, the Debica Presto HP2 generally performs better in mutual tests and offers advantages in cost-effectiveness, environmental balance, and efficiency. However, drivers may find it less than perfectly balanced. The Sava Intensa HP2, though seen as efficient and lighter, also showed an imbalance with significant downside in overall safety performance and sub-optimal marking in environment respect.


Both tyres serve their purpose well as summer tyres but there are areas of improvement for each. Your choice between the two might hinge on your priorities as a driver.

Test Profile

Debica
Presto HP2
Sava
Intensa HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
5
4
10
3
Best position
#4
#12
#2
#2
Average position
12.8
18.3
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2024
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
16
22
104
40

Wet

Wet
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Debica Presto HP2
91%
Sava Intensa HP2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Debica Presto HP2
74%
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Sava Intensa HP2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet handling
Debica Presto HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Costs

Costs
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Debica Presto HP2
75%
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Debica Presto HP2
77%
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Debica Presto HP2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison