18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Debica (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 83% compared to 60% of the Debica Presto HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Debica Presto HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A rating.

Test Profile

Debica
Presto HP2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
5
15
Best position
#4
#2
Average position
12.8
9.0
Latest test
2024
2025
Available sizes
16
225

Wet

Wet
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Debica Presto HP2
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Debica Presto HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet handling
Debica Presto HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Costs

Costs
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Debica Presto HP2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Rolling resistance
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Price/value
Debica Presto HP2
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dry

Dry
Debica Presto HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Debica Presto HP2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison