18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Debica
Presto HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
5
10
3
Best position
#4
#2
#2
Average position
12.8
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
16
104
40

Wet

Wet
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Debica Presto HP2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Debica Presto HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Debica Presto HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Costs

Costs
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Debica Presto HP2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dry

Dry
Debica Presto HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Debica Presto HP2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison