18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Debica Presto HP2

Debica

Presto HP2

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Debica

Presto HP2

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

10

3

Best position

#4

#2

#2

Average position

12.8

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

16

104

34

Wet

Wet

Debica Presto HP2

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Presto HP2

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Presto HP2

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Debica Presto HP2

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Debica Presto HP2

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Costs

Costs

Debica Presto HP2

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Debica Presto HP2

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Debica Presto HP2

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Comfort

Debica Presto HP2

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Debica Presto HP2

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Debica Presto HP2

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Debica Presto HP2

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Debica Presto HP2

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison