Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Debica (58%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 has a better rating of 74% compared to 70% of the Debica Presto HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Debica Presto HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Firestone Roadhawk 2 has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto HP2
| Firestone Roadhawk 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
