18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Debica
Presto HP2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
2
3
Best position
#4
#1
#2
Average position
12.8
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
16
23
34

Wet

Wet
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Debica Presto HP2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Debica Presto HP2
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Debica Presto HP2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet side guide
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Costs

Costs
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
Debica Presto HP2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Debica Presto HP2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison