Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Debica

Presto HP2

VS

PremiumContact 5

R14 – R17

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Presto HP2

PremiumContact 5

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

2

3

Best position

#4

#5

#2

Average position

12.8

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2024

2021

2025

Available sizes

16

74

34

Wet

Debica Presto HP2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 5

66%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Presto HP2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 5

67%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Debica Presto HP2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 5

55%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Presto HP2

91%

Continental PremiumContact 5

70%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Debica Presto HP2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 5

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet side guide

Debica Presto HP2

63%

Continental PremiumContact 5

62%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Costs

Debica Presto HP2

71%

Continental PremiumContact 5

63%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Debica Presto HP2

63%

Continental PremiumContact 5

63%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Debica Presto HP2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 5

63%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Debica Presto HP2

71%

Continental PremiumContact 5

50%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Debica Presto HP2

84%

Continental PremiumContact 5

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Debica Presto HP2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 5

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Debica Presto HP2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 5

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Presto HP2

PremiumContact 5

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison