18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Debica Navigator 3

Debica

Navigator 3

VS

Kumho Solus HA31

Kumho

Solus HA31

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Debica

Navigator 3

Kumho

Solus HA31

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Number of tests

2

3

14

Best position

#8

#8

#8

Average position

17.0

8.3

13.4

Latest test

2025

2019

2026

Available sizes

46

82

153

Wet

Wet

Debica Navigator 3

64%

Kumho Solus HA31

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Navigator 3

60%

Kumho Solus HA31

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Navigator 3

85%

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet braking

Debica Navigator 3

63%

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Wet circle cornering

Debica Navigator 3

90%

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Wet handling

Debica Navigator 3

35%

Kumho Solus HA31

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Snow

Snow

Debica Navigator 3

100%

Kumho Solus HA31

67%

Comfort

Comfort

Debica Navigator 3

98%

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Exterior noise

Debica Navigator 3

98%

Kumho Solus HA31

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Comfort

Debica Navigator 3

69%

Kumho Solus HA31

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry

Dry

Debica Navigator 3

72%

Kumho Solus HA31

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry braking

Debica Navigator 3

73%

Kumho Solus HA31

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Dry handling

Debica Navigator 3

70%

Kumho Solus HA31

53%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Costs

Costs

Debica Navigator 3

81%

Kumho Solus HA31

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Rolling resistance

Debica Navigator 3

81%

Kumho Solus HA31

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison