18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus

Test Profile

Debica
Navigator 3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Number of tests
2
10
6
Best position
#8
#2
#10
Average position
17.0
6.0
12.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2024
Available sizes
46
104
60

Wet

Wet
Debica Navigator 3
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Aquaplaning - cross
Debica Navigator 3
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Nexen N Fera Primus
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Debica Navigator 3
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Nexen N Fera Primus
79%
Wet braking
Debica Navigator 3
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Nexen N Fera Primus
76%
Wet circle cornering
Debica Navigator 3
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Nexen N Fera Primus
70%
Wet handling
Debica Navigator 3
35%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Nexen N Fera Primus
64%

Snow

Snow
Debica Navigator 3
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Navigator 3
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
65%
Exterior noise
Debica Navigator 3
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%

Dry

Dry
Debica Navigator 3
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Nexen N Fera Primus
62%
Dry braking
Debica Navigator 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Nexen N Fera Primus
72%
Dry handling
Debica Navigator 3
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Nexen N Fera Primus
53%

Costs

Costs
Debica Navigator 3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Rolling resistance
Debica Navigator 3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison