18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Debica
Navigator 3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
10
3
Best position
#8
#2
#2
Average position
17.0
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
46
104
34

Wet

Wet
Debica Navigator 3
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Debica Navigator 3
35%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Debica Navigator 3
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Debica Navigator 3
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Debica Navigator 3
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Debica Navigator 3
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Snow

Snow
Debica Navigator 3
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Navigator 3
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Debica Navigator 3
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Debica Navigator 3
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Debica Navigator 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Debica Navigator 3
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Debica Navigator 3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Debica Navigator 3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison