18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Debica Navigator 3

Debica

Navigator 3

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Debica

Navigator 3

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Number of tests

2

10

14

Best position

#8

#2

#8

Average position

17.0

6.0

13.4

Latest test

2025

2026

2026

Available sizes

46

104

153

Wet

Wet

Debica Navigator 3

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Navigator 3

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Navigator 3

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet braking

Debica Navigator 3

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Wet circle cornering

Debica Navigator 3

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Wet handling

Debica Navigator 3

35%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Snow

Snow

Debica Navigator 3

100%

Comfort

Comfort

Debica Navigator 3

98%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Exterior noise

Debica Navigator 3

98%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Comfort

Debica Navigator 3

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry

Dry

Debica Navigator 3

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry braking

Debica Navigator 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Dry handling

Debica Navigator 3

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Costs

Costs

Debica Navigator 3

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Rolling resistance

Debica Navigator 3

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison