18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Debica Navigator 3

Debica

Navigator 3

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Turanza T005

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Debica (0%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Debica Navigator 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

Debica

Navigator 3

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

2

10

Best position

#8

#2

Average position

17.0

6.0

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

46

104

Wet

Wet

Debica Navigator 3

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Navigator 3

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Navigator 3

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet braking

Debica Navigator 3

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

Debica Navigator 3

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

Debica Navigator 3

35%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Snow

Snow

Debica Navigator 3

100%

Comfort

Comfort

Debica Navigator 3

98%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Debica Navigator 3

98%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dry

Dry

Debica Navigator 3

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry braking

Debica Navigator 3

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry handling

Debica Navigator 3

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Costs

Costs

Debica Navigator 3

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rolling resistance

Debica Navigator 3

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison