18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Debica (0%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Debica Navigator 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

Debica
Navigator 3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
10
Best position
#8
#2
Average position
17.0
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
46
104

Wet

Wet
Debica Navigator 3
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Debica Navigator 3
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Debica Navigator 3
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet braking
Debica Navigator 3
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Debica Navigator 3
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Debica Navigator 3
35%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Snow

Snow
Debica Navigator 3
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Navigator 3
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Debica Navigator 3
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Debica Navigator 3
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Debica Navigator 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Debica Navigator 3
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Costs

Costs
Debica Navigator 3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Debica Navigator 3
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison