Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Budget

Debica

Navigator 3

R14 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

9.8

R16 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Navigator 3

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

2

3

26

Best position

#8

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

46

34

66

Wet

Debica Navigator 3

64%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet braking

Debica Navigator 3

63%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet circle cornering

Debica Navigator 3

90%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Wet handling

Debica Navigator 3

35%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Navigator 3

60%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Navigator 3

85%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Snow

Debica Navigator 3

100%

Dry

Debica Navigator 3

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

Debica Navigator 3

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Debica Navigator 3

70%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Comfort

Debica Navigator 3

98%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Debica Navigator 3

98%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Costs

Debica Navigator 3

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

Debica Navigator 3

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Navigator 3

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison