18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Debica
Navigator 3
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
14
10
Best position
#8
#8
#2
Average position
17.0
13.4
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
46
153
104

Wet

Wet
Debica Navigator 3
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet handling
Debica Navigator 3
35%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Debica Navigator 3
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Debica Navigator 3
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet braking
Debica Navigator 3
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Debica Navigator 3
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Snow

Snow
Debica Navigator 3
100%

Dry

Dry
Debica Navigator 3
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry handling
Debica Navigator 3
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Debica Navigator 3
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Navigator 3
98%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Debica Navigator 3
98%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Comfort
Debica Navigator 3
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%

Costs

Costs
Debica Navigator 3
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Debica Navigator 3
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison