18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Debica (50%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 90% compared to 50% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 52% of Debica Frigo HP2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating.

Test Profile

Debica
Frigo HP2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
9
23
Best position
#7
#1
Average position
17.3
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
27
176

Snow

Snow
Debica Frigo HP2
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Wet

Wet
Debica Frigo HP2
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%

Dry

Dry
Debica Frigo HP2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Frigo HP2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Costs

Costs
Debica Frigo HP2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2019225/45 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison