Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Budget

Debica

Frigo HP2

VS

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7

R13 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Frigo HP2

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterCraft WP52+

Number of tests

9

23

3

Best position

#7

#1

#4

Average position

17.3

6.7

4.3

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

27

107

97

Wet

Debica Frigo HP2

68%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Debica Frigo HP2

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Wet circle cornering

Debica Frigo HP2

68%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Wet handling

Debica Frigo HP2

70%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Debica Frigo HP2

69%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Wet braking

Debica Frigo HP2

64%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Snow

Debica Frigo HP2

85%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow braking

Debica Frigo HP2

85%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Snow traction

Debica Frigo HP2

86%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Snow cornering

Debica Frigo HP2

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Snow handling

Debica Frigo HP2

86%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Comfort

Debica Frigo HP2

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Exterior noise

Debica Frigo HP2

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Comfort

Debica Frigo HP2

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Dry

Debica Frigo HP2

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dry braking

Debica Frigo HP2

72%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dry handling

Debica Frigo HP2

61%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Costs

Debica Frigo HP2

82%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Mileage

Debica Frigo HP2

69%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Rolling resistance

Debica Frigo HP2

85%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Price/value

Debica Frigo HP2

94%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2025	225/40 R18	View

Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Frigo HP2

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Add to comparison