18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

CST
Medallion MD-A1
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
2
3
3
Best position
#10
#2
#2
Average position
21.5
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
264
40
60

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet circle cornering
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison