18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

CST
Medallion MD-A1
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
2
3
1
Best position
#10
#2
#1
Average position
21.5
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
264
40
64

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison