18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

CST
Medallion MD-A1
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
3
3
Best position
#10
#2
#2
Average position
21.5
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
264
40
34

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison