18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

CST Medallion MD-A1

CST

Medallion MD-A1

VS

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear summer tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than CST (52%). The first tyre test of CST Medallion MD-A1 was done in 2019, compared to 2025 when was the GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 first tested.

Test Profile

CST

Medallion MD-A1

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

2

3

Best position

#10

#2

Average position

21.5

3.3

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

264

40

Wet

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

CST Medallion MD-A1

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet braking

CST Medallion MD-A1

29%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

CST Medallion MD-A1

99%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet circle cornering

CST Medallion MD-A1

24%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet handling

CST Medallion MD-A1

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Dry

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry handling

CST Medallion MD-A1

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry braking

CST Medallion MD-A1

22%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Costs

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolling resistance

CST Medallion MD-A1

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Comfort

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

CST Medallion MD-A1

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison