18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

CST
Medallion MD-A1
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
2
18
14
Best position
#10
#1
#8
Average position
21.5
6.1
13.4
Latest test
2019
2024
2026
Available sizes
264
47
153

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet circle cornering
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison